Tesla has confirmed it has given up on plans to make a Cybertruck range extender to achieve the range it originally promised on the electric pickup truck.

It started refunding deposits for the $16,000 extra battery pack.

When Tesla unveiled the production version of the Cybertruck in late 2023, two main disappointments were the price and the range.

The tri-motor version, the most popular in reservation tallies before production, was supposed to have over 500 miles of range and start at $70,000.

Tesla now sells the tri-motor Cybertruck for $100,000 and only has a range of 320 miles.

The dual-motor Cybertruck was supposed to cost $50,000 and have over 300 miles of range. In reality, it starts at $80,000 and has 325 miles of range.

Archive link: https://archive.is/CGbaE

  • gradual@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 minutes ago

    Is it just me, or is musk profiting off of selling people tech before it’s actually ready?

    Like, we don’t have the means right now to achieve what he advertises, so he lies about it and then ‘alters the deal’ after taking people’s money.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      That’s exactly what he’s been doing with all his businesses. And it works. Tesla is still hugely overvalued as a company.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      5 hours ago

      One runs front wheels, one runs rear wheels and third one powers the mental gymnastics it takes to be a tesla owner in 2025.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That makes even less sense. Distributing mechanical power on non steering wheels is easy, but for steering wheels requires a more complex and expensive coupling, as well as power losses. Just… why?

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I believe the three motor versions is to add extra power under load to the rear wheels. (A weight/power/range compromise between the 4 and 2 motor versions).

          The motors are essentially in line with the wheels (they have gearing but it’s minimal and internal to the motor housing, not attached like an automatic transmission would be, if that makes sense.)

          The “three motor” design is just the single motor design up front and the dual motor design in the back.

          I’m not sure if they ever actually released the single motor version though.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          How do you figure dual front motors would alleviate any of what you said a front diff would need? Dual front motors will still be rigidly mounted to the chassis, requiring flexible couplings. The rear is also independent, requiring the same flexible couplings whether it’s a diff or motors. CV axles all around. Non-steer wheels still have vertical travel from the suspension.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You wouldn’t need a front differential, for one. But you’re right, unless they somehow made a directly wheel coupled motor that turned with the wheel, it l still needs CV couplings.

            As for rear, they don’t need CV axles. Two simple cross couplings are enough. The speed variability happens significantly when the wheels turn, going up and down is a negligible issue. Cars have been using the much chapter and simple cross couplings in the rear for decades.

            • _stranger_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The CT has four-wheel steering, so yeah, it’s actually more complicated than a regular truck in that regard. I remember reading something about the mechanisms to make that possible taking up a shitload of room.

  • mle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    How hard can it be to produce a simple battery pack, for a company that is in the business of designing and producing battery packs no less…

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Think the end of the article pretty much nails it.

      Tesla needed to install and remove it at a service center. Owners couldn’t remove them themselves. I think it was pretty much dead on arrival at $16,000.

      But I think it could also be as simple as it’s not worth producing due to demand – both due to insufficient people reserving it and not enough Cybertruck buyers to create a market for the range extender.

      Therefore, the range extender is dead for the same reason that the Cybertruck RWD now has the same battery pack as the AWD instead of a smaller pack for less money: the Cybertruck is a commercial flop, and it’s not a high-volume program enough to justify making several battery pack sizes, including a removable one.

  • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ima be honest, I like the design of this thing. I’m big into brutalism and the Delorean is one of my favorite car designs of all time. I was really hoping this would be good, but it has turned out to be one of the worst products in recent history in any category. It’s up there with the humane pin.

    It makes me a little bit sad because I will never be able to live out my cyberpunk fantasy of driving an electric truck made out of bare metal manufactured by a technofascist corporation.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    The dual motor was originally announced to be US$39,900, not 50,000. It is lies all the way down at Tesla.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The dual motor was originally announced at 50k

      Single motor rear-wheel drive with 250 miles of range, 7,500-pound towing capacity, and 0–60 mph capabilities in under 6.5 seconds, for $39,900
      
      Dual motor all-wheel drive with 300 miles of range, 10,000-pound towing capacity, and 0–60 mph in under 4.5 seconds for $49,900
      
    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I was seriously considering it back then. My wife hated the look and wouldn’t let me even consider it, but as someone who likes Back to the Future and Tron, I didn’t hate the aesthetic, though it took some getting used to. And I want a comfortably large EV (my compact is too small for my old bones) with 500 miles to avoid range anxiety. A 100 mile distance in the middle of a midwestern winter without a charger at the other end is going to require 500 miles of range to get back home due to heating the battery and cabin, and driving at 80mph. And my longest daily commute was 212 miles round trip before someone asks how often I need to drive 100 miles away in the middle of winter.

      I wouldn’t say bullet dodged because I was never really close to getting one, but charging three times the price for only 60% range compared to that announcement is fucking insane.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I was transitioning from being a lotus notes developer to a java developer and I was moving back home to the Midwest from DC. As that job took a chance on me and allowed both, it was a really good fucking job for the moment. It eventually transitioned to hybrid.

          We had planned to move to the area but couldn’t find a place we liked and kept living with my folks until I just said fuck it and we bought a house near them instead and I dealt with the commute. Then Covid hit and I got laid off on my two year anniversary.

          Now, my commute is about 70 miles one way 1-2 times per week (and that’s still 3 hours total drive time). That’s a pretty typical drive for me. My kids also live kinda near where I work so even if it weren’t for commuting, I’d still make that drive quite often. As it is, I drive down the night before an office day, spend time with them and stay over night, and then drive back home about 2pm the next day (fucking hate rush hour in Detroit). But I can’t charge at their houses anyway so that doesn’t help.

          I drive a PHEV because there isn’t an EV out yet that can get me there and back. Though I finally have a plug at work if I get in early enough.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Now that’s dedication. I’d probably have driven myself into a ditch by the 3rd month of that (but I haaaate driving)

        • tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Where I live is not super uncommon for people to drive an hour into the nearest city. I don’t recommend it, though!

          It really makes me envious when I see how much Europeans work: my partner already works more hours on average than the average European, and then his commute is on top of that. Why are we here? Give me mandatory vacation and a job I can bike to ANY DAY.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I hate driving so much, I moved somewhere 15 minutes from work even though I only go in like 3 times a month

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      $39,900? Not $40,000? Does Elon still think that old “99” trick still works?

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “Thanks for all the $16k loans at 0% shmucks. We’ve kept the interest we made while rates have been up and now you can have it back while they’re dropping. Of course, your money is now worth less than it was when you gave it to us during high inflation. Suck it losers. Love, T E S L A”

    EDIT: deposit was $150. Still shitty but not the same impact

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    16 hours ago

    However, Tesla had devised a solution to bring the range closer to what it originally announced: a separate battery pack that sits in the truck’s bed. Tesla called it a “range extender.” It costs $16,000 and takes up a third of the Cybertruck’s bed.

    You cannot make this shit up 😂

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Tesla and unfulfilled promises… Only slightly less an iconic duo than Tesla bad news and stock price going up.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    $16.000 just to get what you paid for?

    Some people sure have a lot of money to spend.

    • gradual@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Some people sure have a lot of money to spend.

      It’s why everything is so expensive. So these fucks can give musk money.

    • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Not quite.

      $16k to get closer to what they promised lol Probably won’t do that much considering the added weight

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Tesla now sells the tri-motor Cybertruck for $100,000 and only has a range of 320 miles.

    The dual-motor Cybertruck was supposed to cost $50,000 and have over 300 miles of range. In reality, it starts at $80,000 and has 325 miles of range.

    So, the cheaper model with two motors (why even) has a larger range than the full price model with three motors™®?

    LMAO.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      two motors (why even)

      To have mechanically independent FWD and RWD, this is actually pretty standard for all AWD BEVs and not just Tesla.

        • lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          No ofc not. RWD and FWD and AWD are all different things and are all used in different vehicles because of the various benefits and trade-offs

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Makes sense to me. The cheaper Camry with a 4 cylinder gets better mileage than the more expensive 6 cylinder.