The appliance that elicits anger and frustrated at it’s mere sight. The treacherous device that never worked right.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what I want for the vast majority of appliances. It just needs to do the basic functions reliably and have a few adjustments that I can fiddle with.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s the thing–the actual purpose of the appliances hasn’t changed at all. Every “advancement” is typically proprietary tech made to help comply with energy and water/gas usage standards–or to add perceived value through some half-baked gimmicks. For instance, dishwashers use smaller pumps run for longer periods of time to perform the same amount of work a larger more powerful pump could handle (in many cases a single pump sufficed for a dishwasher–one rotational direction for wash, opposite direction for drain)… I’m totally on board with energy efficiency but the laughably cheap/shitty tech they use to those ends kinda blunt the effectiveness of the energy saving measures (since replacing parts–or more likely entire dishwashers when those pumps fail–is a less energy-saving process than having a stronger, more durable pump that draws an extra amp or 2)

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, saving $40 a year but spending $500 every three years instead of ten isn’t saving money.

    • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I got an inkling that it just isn’t profitable to make quality appliances anymore. Why make something that can last for decades when you can sell people a new appliance every 5-10 years with cheaper parts?

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        It could be profitable, but it isn’t as profitable as making an unreliable and overly complex piece of crap that increases sales totals which jack up stocks.

        Hell, being profitable isn’t even important for lot of businesses anymore, they just want growth.

        • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think this is recently apparent with Instant Pot. Their first model was phenomenal, and if you have one, you probably still do. The newer ones are still pretty good, but they come with small issues, don’t work as well and need more maintenance. Plus, Instant Pot now offers a host of bullshit add-ons to round out the sales line-up.

          I had heard they were considering bankruptcy at some point prior to their recent line of products.

          • Addv4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Think it was something about being bought out by private equity, and being run into the ground. I’ve loved all of the instant pots I’ve owned, only have had more than one because I needed a bigger one.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Being bought out by private equity is a massive red flag for quality, they always go cheap and ride the brand recognition as long as possible.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve seen products like appliances go to hell in my lifetime. There are several issues besides planned obsolescence.

        Used to be, you only had 3 or 4 refrigerators to choose from. They had to be close in quality and everyone knew what order they fell in for quality vs. price. People talked about their experiences and with a limited range of choices, it was easy to know what was best and what sucked. Hell, Lowe’s sells so many different fridges that finding the “best” is too hard to figure. Now I see people talking about manufacturers I’ve never even heard of. Does that make sense?

        Another problem is low prices and will to repair. Stuff is so cheap now, relative to decades ago, that people simply throw stuff out and buy new rather than attempt any sort of repair. Our TV tubes would occasionally burn out. Dad and I would go to the store and consult the kiosk or, at worst, call a repairman. TVs were too damned expensive to not fix. Now people throw out TVs that only need a $60 board off eBay. I find and fix tons of stuff off the side of the road.