• miguel@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      7 out of 9, yes, one went to self-hosted, another left in favor of youtube directly, the rest in favor of twitch. The last two I follow on Patreon (Techmoan and My Mate Vince) just sorta rolled past the whole thing.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Interesting. AFAIK YouTube takes a 30% cut on donations.

        Twitch takes 50% of subs.

        Sounds like the self hosted person is the only one who actually made an improvement?

        I might be out of date on my numbers.

        • miguel@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Only one who wrote about it was the one who went self-hosted, the rest didn’t talk about it. I would guess it ended up being the final straw, like “why direct people to X to back me instead of just promoting myself where they see me.” Especially if, as you say, the cut was so similar.

          • paraphrand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yeah, and doing it on platform/in context means lower friction too. And sometimes has perks only available that way.