• HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I feel like one of the more important things to take away from this is the wildly different degrees to which various students use ai. Yes, 90% may use it, but there is a huge difference between “check following paper for grammar errors: …” and “write me a paper on the ethics of generative AI,” though an argument could be made that both are cheating. But there are things like “explain Taylor series to me in an intuitive way.” Like someone else here pointed out, a 1-2 minute conversation would be a very easy way for professors to find people who cheated. There seems to be a more common view (I see it a LOT on Lemmy) that all AI is completely evil and anything with a neural network is made by Satan. Nuance exists.

    • Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This. Especially in the humanities, the essay is the preferred form of assessment. I don’t have a birds eye view of all colleges, but I know that some of those courses should not have had essay exams. It’s as if teachers forget that other forms of examination exist.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I’d appreciate calls for nuance more if most of the time the people doing it weren’t just excusing hypocrisy and crimes against humanity.