• Doctorzoidy@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I realize there’s all sorts of Microsoft hate out there, mostly justified, but no one has mentioned hyper-v as a replacement for VMware. I’ve got a dozen or so machines running on a single VMware host and after the broadcom buyout decided to swap over, havent pulled the trigger yet as I’m using it to get a new server and wait for our support contract to end.

    In the small/medium business space is proxmox a better bet?

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, if you’re used to Microsoft servers and have a Microsoft network it integrates really nicely and is great to manage. Plus, it’s free.

      • BritishJ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Its not free. You need to license the base windows server. They killed the free hyper-v server offering.

    • thejag52@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      From my experience running heavily Hyper-V over the last 15 years, don’t be afraid of it, it’s worth the look. Especially for a single node like you’re talking, no reason not to in my opinion.

    • Rugtert@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I had a great experience with hyper-v. 2 nodes running about 60 vms for 7 years.

    • Matty_r@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Proxmox is definitely on its way to become a viable replacement for sure. There’s also OpenShift from Red Hat which could be worth a look at as well.