• Beppe_VAL@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Even Sam Altman acknowledged last year the huge amount of energy needed by chatgpt, and the need for a breakthrough in energy breakthrough…

    • anus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Do you hold Sam Altman’s opinion higher than the reasoning here? In general or just on this particular take?

      • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?

        What if power consumption is not so much limited by the software’s appetite, but rather by the hardware’s capabilities?

        • anus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?

          You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them

          I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you’re actually interested

          • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            What weighs more: the cost of taking people at their word, or the effort it takes to interpret the subtext of every interaction?

              • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                You seem to spend a lot of energy questioning people’s intentions, inventing reasons to question whether people’s intentions toward you are genuine. Some do deserve to be questioned, no doubt. It just seems draining, and for what goal?

                Do you aim to be the sole determiner of truth? To never be duped again? To sharpen your skills as an investigator?

                How much more creative energy could you put into the world by taking people at their word in all but the highest risk cases?

                • anus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Stoic desire to be informed and to be a force of good for others with like intentions