• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    us auto industry has reletively higher crash saftey requirements. part of the reason why everythings so damn big.

    the kei trucks are basically rear end death traps if you hit US sized vehicles.

    its why the only ones you can legally drive in some states are the ones that pass the 25 year car import law.

    some areas explicitly ban it (e.g NYC i believe)

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      127
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      EU: Your truck is unsafe because it is unusually large and has razor sharp edges at head height.

      US: Your truck is unsafe because it is too small to withstand a direct hit from one of our super safe giant axe head shaped cars.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I understand now allowing them on the freeways, but they’re perfect for cities with their smaller footprint and lower driving speeds. These aren’t allowed in NYC, but Escalades are?

      • br3d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They don’t make inflated profits for US companies. That’s what this is about

      • Addv4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Cause they’re not really safe to drive. Older US made cars are technically grandfathered in because as time progresses, there will naturally be less and less of them to the point where they won’t be much of an issue on public roads (when was the last time you saw a model t driving down your road other than for a parade or something?). However, a lot of kei trucks were really meant to just be farm vehicles with more utility, so safety wasn’t ever a real hallmark of their design. I considered buying one a while ago, but came to the conclusion that they might actually be less safe than an old S10 which wasn’t really that much bigger.

        • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Safety standards for family vehicles: ok, sure

          Safety standards for non-family vehicles: fascist overreach

    • Mike D.@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The Mini, Yaris, and many other modern cars pass crash -test standards. I do not consider them big.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Kei trucks have basically no crumple zone or front bumper. They are cab over designs, so if you hit something, you’re basically the first thing that takes the impact.

        • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The newer ones have all the modern safety features (crumple zone, bumper, ABS, etc). But of course we aren’t allowed to import the modern ones.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If something goes max 5 kph, shouldn’t it do fine on all the crash tests?

      You don’t have to make something bigger. Sometimes just making it slower works too.