• Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I didn’t make anything up. There was no time component specified by which ownership is kept or lost. I would hazard a bet many of you strongly support squatters rights which are directly related to this yet not accounted for by the stated definitions. This is one of the prime cruxes of the private property argument is the ability for some to own property they don’t occupy all the time.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There was no time component specified by which ownership is kept or lost

      Nor did I say there was.

      This is one of the prime cruxes of the private property argument is the ability for some to own property they don’t occupy all the time.

      The time has nothing to do with this.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        59 minutes ago

        It absolutely does. Can I just own a home and go off around the world and lock it down preventing all others from drawing value from it for years even decades of time. If not how much time must pass before it’s too much time. You want to say a day is fine so someone can go to work. What about 2 or 3 days. What about a week, a couple of months. Can I own one under my own name and my wife under hers and my kids separately under each of their own. What about a trust or some other financial vehicle, what exactly constitutes ownership.