• stephen@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wonder if data going into the hands is also wireless when they’re attached. Seems like a rather critical set of functions to go with wireless instead of a hard connection. Maybe wireless fidelity has improved enough that concerns about things like interference aren’t as big as they used to be.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s one other advantage to wireless here: a bionic prosthetic is moving a lot, and that’s not great for wire harnesses or connectors. Going wireless potentially allows for greater range of movement (or at least removes the engineering challenge of making it durable long term).

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That would be a more interesting line of questioning than all the viral stuff about “mind control” and whatnot.

        It may just be cheaper to slap a wireless connection in there than to engineer routing cables through a fully mobile articulation AND keep the whole thing water resistant. I bet whatever the real answer there it’s fascinating.

        I wish that worked better than Deus Ex collabs and morning show interviews, but given how often I’ve seen this pop up the last couple of weeks it clearly is not.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Deus Ex is a horror universe. Example:

          You work as produce loader. One day, your coworker comes in with a fancy new set of robot arms. He can lift three times as much as you can and work twice as fast. Your hours start getting cut back, boss doesn’t need you anymore. You lose your job. You apply for a new one, but it’s the same story everywhere: companies want cyborgs. So you spend the last of your savings on a set of bionic arms. They work great, and you land a new job. It’s enough to pay for the anti rejection meds and your living expenses. Two years later, a new model comes out. Efficiency improves even more. Your services aren’t needed anymore, and you can’t afford an upgrade.

          You’re homeless now, and you can’t afford the rejection meds. So you sit on the side of the street with a cardboard sign and an empty hat, waiting for your arms to rot off your body as your immune tears the connection apart.

          Drag wouldn’t buy prosthetics from a company that associates themselves with that image.

    • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can see a bunch of geeky engineers in the planning meeting. “Wouldn’t it be cool if it could detach and still work. Think of how she could mess with people.”

    • Strider@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wonder if they’re banking on wireless chips lasting longer than physical ports. Though making them wireless also means batteries and charging ports, two parts notorious for failing.

  • andybytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I wounded if working people will be able to afford this… Given the amount of amputee veterans who lost limbs and veteran suicide rate…me thinks not… But sure it seems pretty nifty…just swell

    • Rin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s also a massive risk when even the advanced ones have a high rejection rate of around 44% that’s never talked about, and don’t have nearly as much fine control as the media makes them out to be on top of being uncomfortably heavy for some people. While some do like them, a lot wind up preferring simpler ones or none at all.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Those articles hit close to home as someone hard of hearing. So much of disability activism is trying to get able people to respect what is comfortable for us to do rather than what is comfortable for able bystanders to see us do.

        Like assistive devices are awesome, but they exist for the people they are used by. We consistently want comfortable independent function without being othered for it. Some will prefer subtle devices, others will ask for a fully controllable rgb option on devices that could be hidden easily.