NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 23 hours agoWikipedia sources their information better than most journalists do in their articles.message-squaremessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1322arrow-down16
arrow-up1316arrow-down1message-squareWikipedia sources their information better than most journalists do in their articles.NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 23 hours agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareBlue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·20 hours agoI could swear that on some occasions Wikipedia sources have sent me to a wayback machine archived site
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·14 hours agoOften a better link than the original, since Wayback is better supported and not prone to the whims of a billionaire oligarch. But it isn’t mandated nor is it integrated with Wikipedia.
I could swear that on some occasions Wikipedia sources have sent me to a wayback machine archived site
Often a better link than the original, since Wayback is better supported and not prone to the whims of a billionaire oligarch.
But it isn’t mandated nor is it integrated with Wikipedia.