• Samantha Xavia@bikersgo.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Okay, but is bluesky at least a setting stone for people to be in a slightly better place than Faceook or Twitter? I don’t like Bluesky as the next Fediverse user, especially as they’ve went out of there way to create a protocol that’s unsecure and a platform that is semi-centralised but people are learning about alternatives like us from them what is at least helpful in someway.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s better in some ways for now. All commercial social media platforms start out by being less bad than the competition. That’s how they attract users. When they have enough of a user base for network effects to take hold, that’s when they enshittify.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      at least a setting stone for people to be in a slightly better place than Faceook or Twitter?

      No, not really. It has already started caving to Turkish political censorship requests for example. They are implementing checkmark bullshit and from the start they required you to have an account to view all content.

      but people are learning about alternatives like us

      99% of bluesky users have never heard of the fediverse or anything like that. They just blindly follow the herd to the next platform like always. In a few years bluesky will turn to complete shit and then they will once again jump to the next garbage platform.