Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1284arrow-down1imageWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square48fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down8·9 hours agoConclusion: the clear vision that Gnome devs have is obviously wrong.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down3·edit-29 hours agoIt’s a non-profit, open source project. If you don’t like it, just ignore it. It’s not a commercial project where market share is important.
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·4 hours agoThe only defense of Gnome: It’s not mandatory. Except they also do GTK, which still manages to leak outside their 9 foot thick steel and concrete containment vessel.
Conclusion: the clear vision that Gnome devs have is obviously wrong.
It’s a non-profit, open source project.
If you don’t like it, just ignore it.
It’s not a commercial project where market share is important.
The only defense of Gnome: It’s not mandatory.
Except they also do GTK, which still manages to leak outside their 9 foot thick steel and concrete containment vessel.