200 XYZ employees are riding a metro line and 150 are in 3 busses, and they all decide to drive one day, OH look there are now up to 350 extra cars on the road today, all going to the same building.
Please tell me how it’s XYZ employees themselves that create congestion and not the extra 350 cars, without saying something along the lines of “if they didn’t all decide to drive that day” or “they should have done something else”
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is a common gun supporter line here. Im doing the same with drivers and cars. The car’s existence isn’t what creates congestion it is your use of it that creates the problem of it. Thus when I make sales calls on clients in rural areas I’ll drive but when going to NYC or any other city I’ll use mass transit.
Cars don’t create congestion, drivers do.
Is that supposed to be satirical or…?
It’s a jab at “gun don’t kill people” phrase used by the anti-gun control crowd.
Okay good. I was concerned they were serious for a second there.
Like Croquette says it’s a reference to “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people” with the difference being cars and drivers.
I wouldn’t he stuck in traffic if I wasn’t driving.
200 XYZ employees are riding a metro line and 150 are in 3 busses, and they all decide to drive one day, OH look there are now up to 350 extra cars on the road today, all going to the same building.
Please tell me how it’s XYZ employees themselves that create congestion and not the extra 350 cars, without saying something along the lines of “if they didn’t all decide to drive that day” or “they should have done something else”
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is a common gun supporter line here. Im doing the same with drivers and cars. The car’s existence isn’t what creates congestion it is your use of it that creates the problem of it. Thus when I make sales calls on clients in rural areas I’ll drive but when going to NYC or any other city I’ll use mass transit.