You and I are posting on the Fediverse right now (capital F). If I create two of my own personal Lemmy instances that only federate with each other, they’re not a part of the Fediverse. I’ve now created my own fediverse (lower-case F). The Fediverse is a fediverse, but not all fediverses are the Fediverse.

Same with internet and Internet. There is the main, collective Internet that we all know and use daily, but it’s one of many internets.

Nobody called you anything, dude. Are we having different conversations or something?

Are you talking about the hypothetical scenario you made up about the subject you don’t even understand? No wonder we’re going in circles.

I’m talking about the article.

Bruh. The task was to mislead. That’s what it did.

That’s not completing a task.

That’s faking a result for appearance.

That was the task.

So working as designed means presenting false info?

Yes. It was told to conduct a task. It did so. What part of that seems unintentional to you?

Read about how LLMs actually work before you read articles written by people who don’t understand LLMs. The author of this piece is suggesting arguments that imply that LLMs have cognition. “Lying” requires intent, and LLMs have no intention, they only have instructions. The author would have you believe that these LLMs are faulty or unreliable, when in actuality they’re working exactly as they’ve been designed to.