I agree.

The vague wording is bad, I think they should just use the absolute values and another one with the percentages, that would make it a lot clearer.

The data showed on that image contradicts this, it says “percentage change in homicides and police killings since 2015”. This is very clear language, “since 2015, this is the percentage change in homicides and police killings”, not “difference between homicides and police killings in this year to 2015”.

I’m talking about the original chart, not this chart specifically, the language is implying different things, probably showing things that are not real, based on the text that was given.

“as other homicides fell”, but shows growth rate. This is just disinformation from the media (New York Times), homicides grew not “fell”, by its own chart.

This must be intentional, because no one would do this using this chart. Is it implying that police killings reduce other homicides? (based on this contradictory chart)

Edit: chart

The race is on a loop, you only pass each point one time. You get from the starting place and return there, passing at each point 1 time, what would be the shortest/fastest path? That’s the problem.

You can probably put weights on the fuel efficiency, based on the cargo weight, distance/speed he can drive (based on the experience and expected value for him), fueling stops, etc. Just add that to A* and some tinkering, I think you could make a good algorithm.

I think this is about the travelling salesman math/computer science problem:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_salesman_problem

A good video about this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GiDsjIBOVoA

Yeah, my bad. Deleting my comment.

deleted by creator

Yeah, I think it was stress that made me have the gastritis. Tried a healthy lifestyle, but it always returns when the work gets tough.

Joined my union today! Now I have at least a lawyer that can help in any case.

Thanks for the advise, I’m going to do this!

Thanks for the advise!

Thanks for the answer!

I’m going to ask my manager about a one on one, but I’m still scared, as they talked about those things in that manner. But still, I’m going to try!

Yeah, 100% agree that if something like that is happening and no one told me, it’s really bad for them, passive-agressive behaviour from management is not something cool.

Surveillance for you, no oversight for me.

He says that, having already adopted the first two, he tackled the third: “When I have the Red Command, Amigos de Amigos (ADA), the PCC here…” he sighs, listing powerful organized crime groups, “as well as a situation in which a huge number of fugitives are roaming the city with impunity, it’s impossible for the police to be arresting everyone. The only way to remove them from circulation to protect society — and place them where [the justice system] has decided they should be — is through technology.”

Funny how a person that’s alledgedly related to PCC (organized crime) complains about them.