

Hey David, can you guess how many people are reading your article from a smartphone? Convenient, isn’t it.
Want to complain about smartphones? Write a book… or something that can be published on fucking paper.
Hey David, can you guess how many people are reading your article from a smartphone? Convenient, isn’t it.
Want to complain about smartphones? Write a book… or something that can be published on fucking paper.
Sorry, too busy waiting. Not laughing yet. Have you tried asking yourself that?
Poor you. I will make sure I laugh next time. Don’t you worry.
Very funny, I’m laughing so hard. So true /s
This was made by someone who doesn’t understand any of it.
Oh no! A boycott coming from people who doesn’t consume the product. What a loss!
Fake. No teacher would call a student dumb for fear of getting sued by their parents.
At least is not mph, that shit makes no sense.
How ruined the question
Is that what I been eating?
What 10yo finds funny:
You’re free to imagine whatever the hell you want.
Yet you still act like a fucking moron, what is your secret?
Do you also read articles and form an opinion of your own?
Damn, really? That’s craaaazy.
Bro, if you’re going to be sarcastic, at least try to sound smart. You just need to read the title to see its fucking propaganda from the opposition.
ITT: People who doesn’t read the article. These science institutions shouldn’t be used for fucking politics.
I wonder if something from the list published in this article has any relation to science or space. Yeah sure, let’s go with “DEI and other Inclusivity programs are NECESSARY for space survival”. I wonder what’s the objective of NASA.
Lol don’t worry, this Astronaut knows pronouns. /s
So, can you guess which percentage of people prefer using an smartphone to read these kind of anti smartphone articles? Do you see the issue? The irony?
This is just trash ragebait dude.