Your capability at projection is astounding.

So you mix the words opening and holes as is possible in common language and then proceed to be anal about the term hole in context of topology. Actually you interepreted openings as holes multiple times. Neither opening nor hole are specific terms in topology though. A scholar of topology uses the common word hole to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student. You probably stumbled across this, partly understood it and decided to use it to fake intellect - and failed. From then on it just got worse.

you’re as bad as a conservative, Please don’t ever do this again. You are make us leftists appear stupid.

While AI/LLMs have their issues and get things wrong they can indeed be used as support tool especially for people struggling intellectually. I recommend you use it for everything as it is your superior in everything. It can even explain the difference between opening and hole to you.

*openings

Amazing, we went from how many openings the human body has to an anatomically incorrect human digestive system to a pipe and then to a cup being a disc.

So you mix the words opening and holes as is possible in common language and then proceed to be anal about the term hole in context of topology. While a scholar of topology uses the common word hole to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student it is not a defined term per se.

For the sake of argument I’ll accept your incorrect application of the term hole as in a pipe having only one hole. This would still mean it has at least 2 openings. In the context of OP (human digestive system) an entry point (mouth) and an exit (anus).

BTW - you shall henceforth consume liquids only from platters and are required to use the word berry only in the biological correct sense (e.g.: straw-thingy, black-thingy, rasp-thingy, cucumberry, pumpberry, pinemultifruit, etc. pp. - have fun)

That awkward moment when you almost realize that a simple LLM easily outsmarts you.

That’s just idiotic.

I hope this helps:

ChatGPT prompt: Explain a tube to a 3 year old

A tube is like a long, empty straw. It’s round and has holes at both ends. You can use it to drink or to let things go through it. Think of it this way: if you have a roll of toilet paper, the inside part is a tube. It’s just a round shape that is empty inside!

EDIT: Instead of the term opening the LLM uses the term hole colloquially here - just as a scholar of topology would to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student. This highlights that you shouldn’t be anal about a “topological hole” while discussing openings. Actually - let’s be real - common language terminology should always be applied first and foremost unless there is specific context.

I think you replied to the wrong post?

Schwanzkäfer

Please go and ask a plumber this question. Preferably a relative at a family gathering and in front of everyone. This will bring enjoyment for years to come.

And a tube has how many openings?

And a pipe has 2 openings otherwise it would be a cup, wouldn’t it?

One digestive? Are you a jellyfish?

That’s insane, pronunciation and meaning are indeed very similar.

Kacke - which is coincidentally a German word that describes the look and taste of said cake very well.

What language is that?

Du bist von hinten wie von vorne.

I agree that videos that take 15 minutes to explain something that could have been explained in 5 suck. A video explaining how to tie a bowline should be longer than a minute. However shorts with useful content are quite rare, maybe not even 1% of shorts content. Still there is useful information, thanks for pointing that out - I even found this useful knot

The biggest problem with shorts IMO is the presentation. You get force fed brain rot junk. Even when you klick on the links to specific videos like you and I provided you are taken to a stream of videos where the next videos are usually of the brain rot type.

Seeing how children are affected by this format/phenomenon and how the extremist right has used it for political gain I think it dangerous to leave it unregulated. I thinks it is possible to prevent the junk watching part without content-based restriction.

Sorry, I’m trying to understand your use case and it is still unclear to me. Did you ever seek out a short video to use as a how to?

Ok, these channels also have the normal length videos covering topics of interest. The shorts seem to be rather a byproduct. How do you personally use them? Do you search for a specific activity or is that part of doom-scrolling shorts?

For the AI one to restrict it from children you have to determine the age of the person accessing it. How do you do that and still allow them to maintain anonymity?

Could be a layered approach. First off you could require it by terms of service and nagging during registration. Anonymous as you only require 2 email-adresses - easy to circumvent due to the same reasons. Due to tech illiteracy of most parents this is probably catching only a minority of cases.

You could enforce id as adult using a 3rd party service - e.g. Google, Apple, government ID, credit card. This would be equal to most current systems in place that I am aware of. As you correctly point out this will have the authenticating entity have a list of the services you use. Hence I’d prefer it to be a government ID over any commercial service. To most people this is also just one more service as they may use Apple, Google, Steam, Epic, etc. pp. Heck, most people (excluding me) use Whatsapp, so they don’t give a fuck about data privacy.

On top of that: We are talking about an AI service that collects and analyzes your data. The chatbot impersonates a friend or (as in the present case) a lover. Before you even typed the 1st sentence they have your email, IP, IP - Geolocation, time zone, preferred language. They probably logged in using an app on a stock Android ROM, so they also know your GPS location, WiFi, cell information, local Temperature, etc. pp. Then they start chatting and divulge even more information. What I’m trying to explain is that the AI company potentially has way more info on you than just the credit card and name. On top of that there is zero control messing with the mental health of children.

For banning short form content. How do you quantify what counts?

First off I’d ban platforms like TikTok entirely. They are effectively damaging society. The mixed content platforms are a more difficult matter - it’s a complex problem.

I could point you to several craftsman channels that produce very informative shorts.

Please do. I don’t know any and I don’t believe 1-2 min videos have any value besides short term endorphine kicks - I’m willing to educate myself though

For banning short form content. How do you quantify what counts?

Looking at shorts on Youtube and Reels on Insta it is more complicated than just banning the categories on each platform. Yes video length is a factor. Also bringing back / requiring public downvote scores will help. Both measures should improve the current situation greatly. Lastly you can use tools already in place but not really used such as the auto recognition and community reporting tools of the platforms - I mean they have them but they don’t use them. E.g. Facebook and Xitter continuously break German hate speech laws without facing consequences.

How is this exactly encroaching on the privacy and freedoms of adults?

How is that the same as policing porn or violent media?

Be specific.

What exactly do you mean by ‘these things’?