thedruid

Meh. Believe none of what you hear and very little of what you can see

Unless a person is in front of you, don’t assume anything is real online. I mean it. Nothing online cannot be faked, nothing online HASNT been faked.

The least trustworthy place in the universe. Is the internet.

You think it’s anti science to want complete disclosure when you as a person are being experimented on?

What kind of backwards thinking is that?

Fucking a. I. And their apologist script kiddies. worse than fucking Facebook in its disinformation

Did you go to trump university? You responded to MY comments which were clear.

Stop moving goal posts ,making assumptions, and resorting to name-calling g it’s a sign of stupidity, that I am not ready to truly apply to you, yet

Now. Good evening.

No. You’re mad at someone who isn’t buying that a. I. 's are anything but a cool parlor trick that isn’t ready for prime time

Because that’s all I’m saying. The are wrong more often than right. They do not complete tasks given to them and they really are garbage

Now this is all regarding the publicly available a. Is. What ever new secret voodoo one. Think has or military has, I can’t speak to.

That’s not the task I mentioned.

I asked what the difference between two modes is. It was wrong. It was confidently wrong.

I

I know. it would be a lot better world if a. I apologists could just admit they are wrong

But nah. They better than others.

No. It gave the wrong answer therefore it didn’t complete the task. It gave the wrong answer. Task incomplete

That’s literally how a task works.

You’re just as bad.

Let’s focus on a spell check issue.

That’s why we have trump

No, the task was To tell me the difference in the two modes.

It provided incorrect information and passed it off as accurate. It didn’t complete the task

You know that though. You’re just too invested to admit it. So I will withdraw. Enjoy your day.

That’s a huge, arrogant and quite insulting statement. Your making assumptions based on stereotypes

Not relevant to the conversation.

And anyone who understands marketing knows it’s all a smokescreen to hide the fact that we have released unreliable, unsafe and ethicaly flawed products on the human race because , mah tech.

That’s not completing a task. That’s faking a result for appearance.

Is that what you’re advocating for ?

If I ask an llm to tell me the difference between aeolian mode and Dorian mode in the field of music , and it gives me the wrong info, then no it’s not working as intended

See I chose that example because I know the answer. The llm didn’t. But it gave me an answer. An incorrect one

I want you to understand this. You’re fighting the wrong battle. The llms do make mistakes. Frequently. So frequently that any human who made the same amount of mistakes wouldn’t keep their job.

But the investment, the belief in a.i is so engrained for some of us who so want a bright and technically advanced future, that you are now making excuses for it. I get it. I’m not insulting you. We are humans. We do that. There are subjects I am sure you could point at where I do this as well

But a.i.? No. It’s just wrong so often. It’s not it’s fault. Who knew that when we tried to jump ahead in the tech timeline, that we should have actually invented guardrail tech first?

Instead we let the cart go before the horses, AGAIN, because we are dumb creatures , and now people are trying to force things that don’t work correctly to somehow be shown to be correct.

I know. A mouthful. But honestly. A.i. is poorly designed, poorly executed, and poorly used.

It is hastening the end of man. Because those who have been singing it’s praises are too invested to admit it.

It simply ain’t ready.

Edit: changed “would” to “wouldn’t”

Nn. It’s to make people who don’t understand llms be cautious in placing their trust in them. To communicate that clearly, language that is understandable to people who don’t understand llms need to be used.

I can’t believe this Is the supposed high level of discourse on lemmy

So working as designed means presenting false info?

Look , no one is ascribing intelligence or intent to the machine. The issue is the machines aren’t very good and are being marketed as awesome. They aren’t

I was born before we landed on the moon. So could be.

You do know the world has been around longer than 40 years, right?

And you weren’t around when the Internet was born if you’re under 40, hell if your under 50, using the the 1970s as a generous approximation of the appearance of packet networks, you still weren’t around at the birth of the internet.

I

I like brave

I won’t use Firefox or chrome anymore. Same goals. Different appearance