• miguel@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Too little, too late. I only know 2 creators that I supported who stayed through all this. Most quit patreon when it was announced… this is hardly the worst of the fees they charge people.

      • miguel@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        7 out of 9, yes, one went to self-hosted, another left in favor of youtube directly, the rest in favor of twitch. The last two I follow on Patreon (Techmoan and My Mate Vince) just sorta rolled past the whole thing.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Interesting. AFAIK YouTube takes a 30% cut on donations.

          Twitch takes 50% of subs.

          Sounds like the self hosted person is the only one who actually made an improvement?

          I might be out of date on my numbers.

          • miguel@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Only one who wrote about it was the one who went self-hosted, the rest didn’t talk about it. I would guess it ended up being the final straw, like “why direct people to X to back me instead of just promoting myself where they see me.” Especially if, as you say, the cut was so similar.

            • paraphrand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yeah, and doing it on platform/in context means lower friction too. And sometimes has perks only available that way.