• ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Tldr: Take the train and be safe.

    Rant: In the EU, you are 35x more likely to die from a car crash, compared to a train crash. The union has created the so-called Vision Zero program, which is designed to reach zero driving deaths by some arbitrarily chosen date in the future. And of course it talks about autonomously driving cars. You know, crazy idea, but what if instead of we bet it all on some hypothetical magic Jesus technology that may or may not exist by the arbitrarily chosen date and instead focus on the real world solution that we already have? But well, the car industry investors would make less money, so I can answer that myself. :(

    Edit: Also, Musk is a Nazi cunt who should die of cancer.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, there is no train station at my house. Or Aldi. Or my kids Kindergarten. And I live Germany, where public transport is excellent on a global level (memes about Deutsche Bahn aside).

      Cars will be necessary for the foreseeable future. Let’s make them as safe as possible while investing in public transport, they are not mutually exclusive.

      PS: fuck Elon.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Speaking as a German: There are fewer train-related deaths because the trains don’t drive.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s kind of the natural result, because cars are good for:

        • navigating a landscape designed to exclude anything but cars
        • conspicuous consumption
        • identity signaling

        And they’re really bad for:

        • people
        • the environment
        • transportation

        Do an honest evaluation, and “don’t use cars” is the inevitable conclusion.