• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Apple patents all sorts of weird shit. 99% of it never gets made. They just want the money from patent litigation and licensing.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    can they even patent that? its already a thing that made it to production on at least one brand that sells in north america and another two or more in china

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I was gonna say, pretty sure I’ve seen something like this on Amazon already, except from some weird Chinese company.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I would agree, but yet again, this is something I’ve seen 4 other versions of before apple gets to it.

  • Tilgare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I mean, this wouldn’t be all that stupid imo. Add some Apple watch functionality like fitness detection and easy syncing between phone and iPod Nano Buds, this would be a solid addition to a runner’s arsenal leaving no need to carry your $1000 phone on a run. Suppose you could use your watch for that and leave the case at home though. But more options aren’t a bad thing, not everyone has or wants a watch.

    • Newsteinleo@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      You are right, but I also think you missed the point of the post. This is basically an iPod nano from 2005 with a few extra features.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      leaving no need to carry your $1000 phone on a run.

      my brother in christ it’s called an MP3 player.

      • Tilgare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Yeah, precisely. That’s what this would be, built into your headphone case. You never have one without the other.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          right, then what if you could sync any bluetooth headphones to the case? mind blown

          edit : or if it had a 3.5mm jack, so you could use wired headphones too? amazing. in fact, what if it also took AA batteries for emergencies?

  • fluffy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I mean, IF they also add internal storage for mp3 files and it would act as an oldschool mp3-player/ipod, that would be actually cool … but I don’t need another display … you already have one on your phone and maybe also on your wrist

  • Katzelle3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Doesn’t the Apple Watch already fulfill the function of an iPod Nano? It works with Bluetooth headphones and has 16 GB of storage you can use for music, which is a lot by iPod Nano standards.

    • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      My series 9 has 64GB. I have multiple playlists downloaded to it which is great for the gym. You can also just stream music from it over wifi or cellular.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m surprised nobody has done yet as I’ve seen all sorts of features be added to earphone cases. Maybe a decent touchscreen is not yet cheap enough to throw at some case without the profit margin of the apple brand.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I have earbuds that don’t need to be charged and use a cable for easy connectivity and sound quality.

    • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Both have their pros and cons. I miss my Westone 1 IEMs that I had back in college. My buddy’s dog chewed them up. They were comfortable and super light, had great sound quality, a cord that wasn’t obnoxious. Not having a cord is great though too especially when I’m working. Multipoint connection is great too. I can be listening to stuff on my phone with it in my pocket, no cable getting in the way, and when I get a call on Teams, my Pixel Buds just switch over to the computer.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        it kills me that urbanears stopped making the Plattan Bluetooth model, it was basically the perfect design for on-ear headphones

        Note the 3.5mm jack, it could do both wireless and wired, and you could even use the jack to output music! like come on how is this not the standard design? i have seen the light and now every time i look at other headphones they just seem obviously subpar

    • moonburster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      My earbuds are connected to a bt receiver that functions as a (not great, but okay) dac via usb too. Pro is that I can use the receiver with all my headphones, con is that it looks like an iPod shuffle gen 3

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      You know what’s easier than a cable? No cable.

      I’ll give you sound quality, but the whole reason that wireless earbuds took off is the hassle of wires.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        And also no latency. Even expensive Bluetooth headphones and earbuds have crap latency. The systems that don’t are either proprietary and not widely supported (e.g. aptX) or expensive 'phones-and-dongle arrangements that must always travel in a pair and still don’t compete on latency with a pair of dollar store earbuds.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Unless you’re using them for gaming or some other interactive medium, latency doesn’t really matter though. For music, latency is irrelevant and for video, your device will take care of syncing the audio and video playback so it’s a non issue. Audio quality is an entirely different matter of course.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Your video player “can” account for latency if you configure it correctly which I imagine the majority of people don’t do, and simply put up with it. Ditto with your music playback always lagging 1-2 seconds behind your control inputs. I have never used a media player on any platform that automatically figured out audio latency. Maybe the iDevices do if you pair them with Airpods, I don’t know; I don’t own anything Apple and I never will.

            It also matters for music production, and makes life a lot more pleasant for audio/video editing. Plus, latency is just annoying in any setting.

            • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              If you have 1-2 seconds of audio delay with bluetooth, something is wrong. SBC bluetooth audio has like 200ms max.

              Which is noticable if you make an effort, but for non-interactive media, it’s negligible imo.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              Your video player “can” account for latency if you configure it correctly which I imagine the majority of people don’t do.

              Windows and Android do this automatically out of the box, don’t know about other platforms.

              Ditto with your music playback always lagging 1-2 seconds behind your control inputs.

              Since music isn’t an interactive medium, this doesn’t really matter much (also the latency is more like 100 to 500 ms depending on a variety of factors)

              It also matters for music production, and makes life a lot more pleasant for audio/video editing

              Well of course, if you’re doing that A) this is not an application for wireless audio solutions so…uh…duh and B) you’re probably not on a phone if you take video or music production seriously 😅

            • hikaru755@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              There’s nothing to configure with modern android and Windows devices, it just works from my experience. Watching a video on YouTube or on the native media players at least you get a fraction of a second where it’s out of sync and then it pauses the video for whatever time necessary to get back in sync, and no issues from there on out.

              The only instances where I notice it doesn’t work are games and video editing software, but yeah, those are just not use cases where wireless audio is appropriate

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          not widely supported (e.g. aptX)

          I can find over 600 aptX capable headphones as well as over 850 phones, also any laptop I ever had supported it (Linux though, so probably not always “official” lol).

          Low latency is a thing, you can get this as low as ~30-50ms either through aptX LL / Adaptive, whatever the manufacturer apps do or by manually meddling with the settings for SBC. Will get rather unstable though since you effectively get rid of the buffer. Really depends on your usecase what you prefer. Personally I love having ANC headphones that support bluetooth but also got a headphone jack in cases where I sit in trains, buses or planes for hours and want to play some games or listen to music with a DAC.

      • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        You really think that’s a dunk? “Wireless” just means you plug it in when not in use. There’s nothing hard about plugging in a 3.5mm audio jack. I’ve never been sufficiently convinced to actually use wireless headphones. They seem like more of a hassle for a worse listing experience.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          what universe do you live in? wireless is obviously more convenient since you just put the buds in your ears and click play, with wires you have to also put in the wire and you have a physical cable that can get caught on things or get in the way.

          just get a pair of cheapo wireless earbuds and genuinely try using them, you’ll most likely realize that it is actually way more convenient and that actually you just wanted to be a reverse hipster.

          • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            My experience comes from previous attempts at using wireless headphones. It’s just easier for me to plug in and not have to do literally anything else for a premium listing experience.

      • Robbity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        No, what did it was removing headphone jacks and selling only crappy non-repairable headphones.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        You know what’s easier than no cable? Not losing your ear buds

        Haven’t been able to use ear buds outside of the house ever since they got rid of the jack

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’ve never lost one in at least a decade of using them. But, I don’t use the kind that just balance on the edge of your ear.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            LPT: pull up on your ear while inserting earbuds, this will let them squeeze further into the ear canal which has been the difference between them refusing to stay in the ear, and being rock solid in there. Better seal against outside noises as well.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        The reason wireless earbuds took off is that phones with headphone jacks stopped getting made.
        Consumers didn’t prefer wireless earbuds. They preferred thinner and more water-resistant phones.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          other way round, manufacturers realized people don’t particularly care about aux jacks and so they went ahead and got rid of them so they could get said benefits.

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I personally switched to wireless back when my phone still had a headphone jack. It’s just the better overall experience for me, and I suspect that I’m not alone in that. I’m going to continue arguing for manufacturers to keep including a headphone jack, but it’s not because I prefer wired headphones personally.

        • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Lol, people downvoting you like they weren’t manipulated into spending 10x as much for a product that can’t be repaired, all in the name of profit.

            • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Apple has gone out of their way to make it near impossible or impractical to repair their phones. I’m not spending my time making a list you’re not going to read. If you’re actually interested in learning, seek out Louis Rossmann on YouTube. Here’s just videos JUST Apple https://www.youtube.com/@rossmanngroup/search?query=Apple

              You know how many people I know that have a cheap phone. One. Do you think my nieces and nephew would “settle” for cheap phones in grade school… LOL no. And if you’re like “Well it’s the parents…blah blah blah” then you’ve completely clocked out on the 8 hour bully sessions kids can receive, so don’t start.

              You vastly underestimate Apples marketing and influence. I’ve argued with so many people that “well I like my AirPods” despite the fact phones UNTIL Apple killed the 3.5mm jack, had Bluetooth audio. The entire reason to remove the jack was to push sales of over priced e-waste.

              Don’t @ me with this “you do realize” BS.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I really dont get cable simping here on Lemmy. It’s awful UX and yall can’t hear the sound difference anyway lmao

      • And009@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Depends on the earphone. But majority wouldn’t care.

        TWS is hands down more intuitive.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      see i have no problem with thin silicone cases, that just seems like common sense.
      but the thick ones i do not understand, how would you end up in a situation where you need that much protection for something as light as an earbud case? Surely the silicon sleeve is just there to prevent scratches?