• Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The difference is creativity. If a completely uncreative person and an actual artist both used AI to make something, I’m willing to put money down that the actual artist will produce something a lot more interesting and profound than the uncreative person.

    Especially when you get down to the kind of people that didn’t even realise which machine was being raged against and who have zero media literacy or reading comprehension. It doesn’t matter how good the AI is, the work they produce is still going to be bottom tier crap.

    • EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s usually why these kinds of people like AI. They are utterly lacking in creativity. The accessibility argument is such bullshit too. Yes, if we ignore the glaring theft issues with training these models, then in a certain sense it would’ve allowed someone like me to continue making art when my wrists were in such excruciating pain that I couldn’t even hold my stylus. But that’s not why these chuds like AI.

      They like AI because they hate art and they hate artists. They hate artists because artists have those skills and they don’t. So they want to automate them out of existence. They want to make those skills that make them feel inferior worthless.