• wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is all extrapolated from google’s self published survey of how their users interact with their search results. Approximately 60% of users don’t click anything after a search. Personally I think that is because users have found their results to be seo garbage and not worth clicking on… but that’s just my opinion.

    • CubeOfCheese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’ve watched a lot of students do a search after I tell them to research something, look through a few of the summaries, then look at me in defeat. I have to tell them to actually click some links to try and find an answer

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I went to college for networking but the most productive class I’ve ever had where I learned the most about the internet was instead back in high school. This teacher would make 20 page packets with the most obscure questions like what’s the weight of model number 62xRG4 (some obscure car part or something) and he told us to google it. We would spend entire classes just searching for information we would never use, but it drilled into me how to go about finding the information I need. It’s been utterly invaluable. Thank you Mr Ward.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      god what I wouldnt give to go back to the days of the mid 90s, when the internet was nothing more than a collection of tech weirdos, with websites being nothing more than passion projects with no advertising, no SEO, no search engines, etc etc.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s not gonna happen, and I even disagree with the statement but I can see the merit in it.

      That being said the new business model will be the old business model, where everything is paid for. And I do not think that’s so bad, for example I’d pay for a browser if it respects my privacy.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Trying to comment in this thread and it tells me “Toastify is awesome”? wth?

    edit: nevermind? whatever borked seems to have fixed itself? I don’t know.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    For a glorious second, the entire world was able to communicate as one.

    Then we catalogued every accessible reservoir of culture and knowledge, mined them bare, and refilled them with slop.

    A global collective consciousness, hollowed out, replaced with static. No signal. Only noise.

    • kadup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I really non ironically miss the friction of the old internet.

      I prefer how it took time to find some bare HTML university website, slowly browse through an index as if it was a book, and then find one non-SEO optimized page with all the information you needed on a topic for your research.

      The time to browse, being exposed to other terms, having to select the pages yourself, being skeptical by nature, and then having to copy it by hand… This is a much more positive scenario than having a gigantic company learn everything about you and everybody else and then make these decisions for you, using some hidden algorithm, and with the ultimate goal of pushing their newest process. And of course, the content has been rendered virtually useless to appeal to that algorithm.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        when the internet was a wild and unexplored frontier, and we were adventurers charting the unknown.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Wild and magical, where we…upon getting our first connection to this wide world of wonder, would just explore. Clicking every link with wild abandon and discovering magic behind every one of them. No need for caution, Viruses were rare, Malware didnt exist, just spread wings gliding over vast lands of unbridled discovery… Not even realizing 16 hours had passed and you had missed sleep, the adrenaline of adventure keeping you going, wide eyed and focused.

            God I’m depressed now.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s because real information looks like that. If you can find a shortcut, then it’s fake.

      • isaakengineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sorry for beginner reaction, can I use this in a website for an open source XHTML-extension I am developing? do I need to credit you somehow or lemmy link is enough or what is the best practice here?

        • kadup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t know what the general policy is on Lemmy or the default license, but absolutely, feel free to use it, lemmy link is enough

          Don’t forget to share your extension with us once you’re comfortable.

  • xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So you’re saying the ad driven internet will die? And we will be left with what? Wikipedia and Lemmy? I for one welcome our AI overlords!

    • jonathan7luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This is part of the larger problem that AI tools are trained on (and profit off of) content that is produced and hosted by others who are now seeing their traffic change from humans to bots. For content sources that pay for hosting with ads, this means a loss in revenue to pay for hosting. For content sources like Wikipedia, they are seeing their hosting costs increase significantly due to the increase in bot traffic. Even if you want every website that depends on ad revenue to fail (which I don’t entirety agree with), AI is still damaging the open web in other ways. Websites like Wikipedia for example may soon be forced to lock content behind logins or leverage aggressive captchas just to fight the bot traffic, which makes things worse for those of us that still prefer to use actual websites over AI summaries.

      • pinkapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Nobody is scraping wikipedia over and over to create datasets for AIs, there are already open datasets and API deals. But wiki in particular has always had a data dump of the entire db bimonthly.

        https://dumps.wikimedia.org/

        • jonathan7luke@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But with the rise of AI, the dynamic is changing: We are observing a significant increase in request volume, with most of this traffic being driven by scraping bots collecting training data for large language models (LLMs) and other use cases. Automated requests for our content have grown exponentially, alongside the broader technology economy, via mechanisms including scraping, APIs, and bulk downloads. This expansion happened largely without sufficient attribution, which is key to drive new users to participate in the movement, and is causing a significant load on the underlying infrastructure that keeps our sites available for everyone.

          - https://diff.wikimedia.org/2025/04/01/how-crawlers-impact-the-operations-of-the-wikimedia-projects/

        • TheOneCurly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You clearly haven’t run a website recently. Until I set up anubis last week I was getting constant requests from dozens of various bot scrapers 24/7. That included the big ones.

          • pinkapple@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Kay, and that has nothing to do with what i said. Scrapers, bots =/= AI. It’s not even the same companies that make the unfree datasets. The scrapers and bots that hit your website are not some random “AI” feeding on data lol. This is what some models are trained on, it’s already free so it’s doesn’t need to be individually rescraped and it’s mostly garbage quality data: https://commoncrawl.org/ Nobody wastes resources rescraping all this SEO infested dump.

            Your issue has everything to do with SEO than anything else. Btw before you diss common crawl, it’s used in research quite a lot so it’s not some evil thing that threatens people’s websites. Add robots.txt maybe.

            • TheOneCurly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Oh ok I’ll just ignore the constant requests from GPTBot, ByteSpider, and the hundreds of others who very plainly, sometimes in their useragent, tell you that they’re grabbing content for training data. Robots.txt is nice and all but manually adding every single up and coming AI company is impossible. Like I said Anubis is the first time I’ve gotten them all to even remotely calm down.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Nah, it’s saying that ad and AI-driven internet will prevail. People only use Google to find an answer and don’t dig deeper, and if they do, it’s often because the links are sponsored. People using GPT’s are even less likely to click a link. Currently no ads, but just wait.

      Apologies if you were joking.

      • kadup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        “what should I do if I’m going through severe emotional distress? How to choose a good psychiatrist?”

        ChatGPT: "I’m sorry to hear that you’ve been going to a stressful situation, it’s always worth talking about your feelings. I’ve come up with a plan to help you:

        1 Purchase an ice cold Pepsi Black™ from a Pepsi official supplier"

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Normies get AI slop, prosumer uses local llm…

        Not sure about social media… Normie is allergic to reading anything beyond daddy’s propaganda slop. If it ain’t rage bait, he ain’t got time for it

        • TheOneCurly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Home grown slop is still slop. The lying machine can’t make anything else.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            At least my idiocy ain’t training the enemy.

            Also, AI ain’t there to be correct. AI is there to help you get something done if you already know the outcome mostly.

            It can really turbo charge a Linux experience for example.

            Also local is way less censored and can be tweaked ;)

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            https://ollama.org/

            You can pick something that fits your GPU size. Works well on apple silicon too. My fav’s now are qwen3 series. Prolly best performance for local single gpu

            Will work on CPU/RAM but slower

            If you got Linux, I would put into a docker container. Might too much for the first try. There easier options I think.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I use oobabooga, little bit more options in the gguf space then ollama but not as easy to use imo. Does support openAI api connection though so can plug in other services to use it.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It would be very naïve to think they won’t go against Wikipedia and the fediverse at some point unfortunately…

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The web doesn’t have a business model, cloudflair, you do. And nobody cares because you suck.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Eh, Cloudflare provides a pretty good service for a very reasonable price.

      But yeah, the web doesn’t have a business model in the same way a town square doesn’t, yet you can make a business work in both areas. Make a compelling product and people will pay you for it.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You mean product that literally makes web unusable for many and tracks your every single step with extremely invasive fingerprinting techniques? That product?

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’d say that getting your server DDoSed makes it a whoooole lot less usable.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s a big reason why I don’t use their security layer, mostly just their domain registrar. They have a ton of products that don’t involve tracking your users.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Cloudflare provides a pretty good service for a very reasonable price.

        You mean selling fingerprinted user data to advertisers?

  • devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It needs to get even nastier so that it affects all the big players in a huge way so they get to do something about it. While it only affects the indie web we are all just gonna keep suffering.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Uhh, dude. Haven’t you heard that Siri is basically useless?

      Maybe that’s why she just typed this post instead of inserting the meme.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah I think we’re going to be grappling with this issue for at least the next decade. The traditional web model falls apart under AI

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The traditional web was long gone anyways. There are like a dozent sites you find for any Google query. It’s so hard to find small hidden treasure on the internet.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      To be fair, the traditional web models were falling apart prior to AI as well. We’ve gone so far past “ad driven” that Everything has to be full of ads and clickbait to drive revenue just to run the infrastructure, let alone pay for the pages creation and upkeep. Journalists and developers, services and goods are all using adword soup to try to get anything close to a useful revenue stream and it’ll just keep getting worse until we figure out a better business model. We’re going to increasingly see paywalls to try to make up for that, but a large part of people on the internet won’t want to spend money on quality sources when they use to be able to get it for free. It’s been a race to the bottom for a while and it’s at a point that isn’t sustainable long term. AI just accelerates that to the next level.

      • feannag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        What’s challenging about paywalls and not wanting to spend money is not necessarily not wanting to spend, but convenience and cost. If it costs me 10 cents for each blog or tutorial or github page I look at while working on a project, or 1 cent for every funny video, that adds up. And do I have to put my credit card in for every site? Hope that every site has good enough security to prevent payment information leaks?

        And I don’t think anyone is interested in a Netflix-style internet that fractures into 6 different subscriptions to get every site you need on the web.

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Some sort of universal microtransaction layer is the dream. I believe there’s also a proposed web standard for it.

          Scroll was also making it work before they got bought by Twitter