• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean the guy is a straight laced professor of economics who wrote his thesis on the advantage of competition. He’s not exactly a working class hero. However, it could have been way worse and anyone who can’t see that just needs to look at the US to find out what happens when you don’t vote for the lesser of two evils.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah well Monopoly isn’t solidarity, it’s oppression, so fighting that is good in my book.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            A liberal fights a monopoly by competition, so that no single capitalist gains more profits over the other capitalists.

            A socialist fights a monopoly by socializing it and making it a utility that works to meet the needs of the population, eliminating the profit motive.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The implication that I believe you are missing is that all humans are to some degree evil, and that goes doubly so for the type of human that finds themselves working in the world of politics.

        It’s tongue-in-cheek, and that was very well known when the phrase originally came out.

        The subtlety seems to have been lost over time.